{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@graph": [
    {
      "@type": "Dataset",
      "@id": "https://rocketsfight.org/schema/timeline.json",
      "name": "McNeil & Poyer v. SAC 181, LLC et al. – Timeline & Image Tracks",
      "description": "Structured timeline of key events in McNeil & Poyer v. SAC 181, LLC et al., including retaliatory eviction sequence and two unauthorized image publication tracks (Roadstead stills and Meridian Matterport tour).",
      "creator": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Rocket's Fight",
        "url": "https://rocketsfight.org"
      },
      "license": "https://rocketsfight.org/disclaimer",
      "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/explainer-and-timeline",
      "temporalCoverage": "1939-01-01/2026-02-20",
      "spatialCoverage": {
        "@type": "Place",
        "name": "181 Gordon Street, Charleston, SC 29403",
        "address": {
          "@type": "PostalAddress",
          "streetAddress": "181 Gordon St",
          "addressLocality": "Charleston",
          "addressRegion": "SC",
          "postalCode": "29403",
          "addressCountry": "US"
        },
        "sameAs": [
          "https://www.meridianresidentialgroup.com/listings/detail/405290b8-8fff-4737-a61b-eb7e71e35fde"
        ]
      },
      "distribution": [
        {
          "@type": "DataDownload",
          "encodingFormat": "text/html",
          "contentUrl": "https://rocketsfight.org/explainer-and-timeline"
        }
      ],
      "includedInDataCatalog": {
        "@type": "DataCatalog",
        "name": "Rocket's Fight Case Materials",
        "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case"
      },
      "additionalProperty": [
        {
          "@type": "PropertyValue",
          "name": "imageTracks",
          "value": [
            "https://rocketsfight.org/schema/image-track-roadstead-stills",
            "https://rocketsfight.org/schema/image-track-matterport-tour"
          ]
        },
        {
          "@type": "PropertyValue",
          "name": "coreTimeline",
          "value": [
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Lease start",
              "description": "Lease begins at 181 Gordon Street, establishing long-term tenancy and the backdrop for later disputes.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2020-03-01"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "leaseStart"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Establishes long-term tenancy and history of prior litigation with same owner/manager network."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Management change to Meridian",
              "description": "Meridian Residential Group, LLC acquires Roadstead Management’s portfolio, assuming management of 181 Gordon Street.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2023-12-27"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "managementChange"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Fixes owner knowledge and duty of due diligence in selecting and retaining Meridian as property manager."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Tenant safety request",
              "description": "Tenants raise safety concerns and request reasonable protections during a heat wave.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/pdf/safety-requests-in-lease-renewal-proposal-email",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-05-23"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "tenantSafetyRequest"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Protected activity under South Carolina landlord-tenant law; anchors retaliatory eviction analysis."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Notice to vacate",
              "description": "Notice to vacate is issued shortly after tenant safety requests.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/pdf/ghost-notice-to-vacate-and-renovations-pretext-email",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-05-29"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "noticeToVacate"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Start of alleged retaliatory eviction sequence."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Listing with tenant images and showings",
              "description": "Shortly after notice to vacate on a renovations pretext, the occupied home is marketed online with Roadstead still images that include tenant belongings, and showings are scheduled for prospective replacement tenants.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-06-29"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "listingWithTenantImagesAndShowings"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfImageTrack",
                  "value": "https://rocketsfight.org/schema/image-track-roadstead-stills"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Strong circumstantial evidence that the stated renovations pretext was false, because the property was immediately marketed and shown to new tenants instead of being taken offline for substantial renovation."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "AI-removal promise by leasing agent",
              "description": "Leasing agent promises AI-based removal of tenant images from a planned Matterport tour to secure tenant cooperation.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/meridian-residential-groups-privacy-invasion-unauthorized-family-images-published-across-20-platforms",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-07-14"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "aiRemovalPromise"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfImageTrack",
                  "value": "https://rocketsfight.org/schema/image-track-matterport-tour"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Fraudulent inducement to consent to interior imaging."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Matterport shoot",
              "description": "Matterport 3D tour is filmed inside the occupied home, capturing tenants and personal branding.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/meridian-residential-groups-privacy-invasion-unauthorized-family-images-published-across-20-platforms",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-07-15"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "matterportShoot"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfImageTrack",
                  "value": "https://rocketsfight.org/schema/image-track-matterport-tour"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Creates virtual tour later published and allegedly used to retaliate against tenants as well as creating the impression of an endorsement by tenants."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Post-eviction rent spike listing",
              "description": "Property is advertised to new tenants at a rent level above $5,000, far higher than the amount paid by the existing tenants who were being pushed out.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-07-19"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "rentSpikeListing"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Supports the theory that the 'renovation' narrative and eviction were pretextual; the rent spike shows an intent to support the story that the forced displacement was due to a need to renovate, which was undermined by the immediate listing and showings."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Listing removed after rent spike",
              "description": "Rental listing for 181 Gordon Street is removed from the market shortly after the dramatic post-eviction rent spike, following plaintiffs’ explicit questioning of defendants’ motives. But the images and virtual tour of Plaintiffs their belongings stayed live, unbeknownst to them for months.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-07-26"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "listingRemovedAfterSpike"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Further undermines the renovation pretext; removing the premium listing soon after a motive-challenging email supports an inference that defendants recognized the marketing behavior contradicted their stated reasons for displacement."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Forced move and Rocket incident",
              "description": "Plaintiffs vacate 181 Gordon Street; shortly thereafter their elderly, vision-impaired dog Rocket becomes trapped under a couch in the unfamiliar environment, whimpering until discovered.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-08-01"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "forcedMoveRocketIncident"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Illustrative evidence of the human emotional harm caused by the retaliatory displacement, showing disruption of carefully constructed care routines for a vulnerable dependent animal as part of plaintiffs’ emotional-distress damages."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Deposit statement and alleged mailing date",
              "description": "Meridian allegedly finalizes the security-deposit statement and claims to have mailed refund checks the following day, later relying on an internal 'E-MAILED 8/28/2025' stamp as proof of timely mailing.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/pdf/falsified-postmark-envelope-and-tara-bayles-email",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-08-27"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "depositStatementAndClaimedMailing"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Starts the contested deposit-timeline narrative; later envelope metadata and USPS postmarks are used to challenge the truth of the alleged August 28 mailing and support statutory deposit-violation and falsified-document claims."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Formal demand letter to owner and manager",
              "description": "Plaintiffs send a FedEx demand letter to both SAC 181, LLC and Meridian detailing deposit issues and early indications of misconduct.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-09-04"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "formalDemandLetter"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Documents plaintiffs’ early good-faith efforts to resolve the dispute and gives defendants clear notice of alleged violations before litigation escalates."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Falsified 'postmark' envelope provided",
              "description": "Meridian’s PMIC emails plaintiffs a scan of an envelope and statement described as proof of an August 28 mailing, bearing an internal 'E-MAILED 8/28/2025' stamp that is later admitted not to be a USPS postmark.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/pdf/falsified-postmark-envelope-and-tara-bayles-email",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-09-05"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "falsifiedPostmarkProvided"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Central falsified-document incident supporting claims of deceptive practices around statutory deposit deadlines and forming a core evidentiary pillar for sanctions and credibility attacks on defendants’ narrative."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Initial complaint filed",
              "description": "Plaintiffs file the initial civil complaint in Charleston County Common Pleas Court, launching McNeil & Poyer v. SAC 181, LLC and Meridian Residential Group, LLC.",
              "url": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A1",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-09-09"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "initialComplaintFiled"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Marks the formal beginning of the present lawsuit and frames the dispute as moving from demand-letter stage to full litigation."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Actual deposit delivery and real USPS postmark",
              "description": "Plaintiffs receive the deposit refund checks via USPS; the envelope bears a genuine September 8 Columbia, SC postmark, and the check numbers match those shown in Meridian’s earlier scan.",
              "subjectOf": [
                {
                  "@type": "Article",
                  "name": "Falsified Postmark Envelope and Tara Bayles Email",
                  "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/pdf/falsified-postmark-envelope-and-tara-bayles-email",
                  "description": "See the 'postmark' for yourself - do you think this is an actual USPS postmark?"
                }
              ],
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-09-10"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "actualDepositReceipt"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Demonstrates the discrepancy between the claimed August 28 mailing and the true September 8 postmark, undermining defendants’ timeliness narrative and bolstering deposit-violation and falsification allegations."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Amended complaint and expanded defendants",
              "description": "Plaintiffs file an Amended Complaint adding individual defendants and clarifying claims; a representative accepts service for four of the five named parties.",
              "url": "hhttps://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A3",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-09-15"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "amendedComplaintFiled"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Expands exposure beyond the entity level, setting up negligent retention, personal involvement, and unified-enterprise arguments against individuals tied to Meridian and SAC 181."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Discovery of unauthorized image publication",
              "description": "Plaintiffs discover widespread unauthorized online publication of their images and belongings across multiple rental platforms, including still photos and the Matterport virtual tour.",
              "subjectOf": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/meridian-residential-groups-privacy-invasion-unauthorized-family-images-published-across-20-platforms",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-09-18"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "unauthorizedImagesDiscovered"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Transforms the case from a pure deposit and retaliation dispute into a major privacy and false-endorsement action, multiplying potential damages and bringing third-party syndication platforms into focus."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Evidence preservation and takedown notices",
              "description": "Plaintiffs send evidence preservation notices and takedown demands to platforms hosting the unauthorized images, prompting rapid changes to listings such as 'coming soon' graphics and image removals.",
              "subjectOf": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/meridian-residential-groups-privacy-invasion-unauthorized-family-images-published-across-20-platforms",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-09-21"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "preservationAndTakedownNotices"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Shows prompt mitigation efforts by plaintiffs and generates circumstantial cover-up evidence when platforms alter listings in close temporal proximity to the legal notices."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Evidence of coordinated cover-up on platforms",
              "description": "Within days of takedown demands, multiple platforms modify the 181 Gordon listings with 'coming soon' graphics and other changes, reducing visibility of the previously published images.",
              "subjectOf": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/meridian-residential-groups-privacy-invasion-unauthorized-family-images-published-across-20-platforms",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-09-23"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "platformCoverUpBehavior"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Supports an inference that defendants and/or platforms sought to minimize evidentiary exposure once legal risk around unauthorized images and syndication was made explicit."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "LLR complaint filed",
              "description": "Plaintiffs file complaint with SC LLR against Tara Bayles PMIC License 83633 alleging violations of SC Code 40-57-136 trust account requirements.",
              "subjectOf": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A37",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-09-23"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "llrComplaintFiled"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Initiates 150-day investigation (deadline Feb 20, 2026); creates regulatory threat to Tara's license that drives subsequent defense obstruction."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "LLR acknowledgment letter",
              "description": "J. Watson Wharton III issues acknowledgment letter assigning Investigator Kasey Williams to File 2025-566.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-10-02"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "llrAcknowledgment"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Confirms investigation active; establishes Feb 20, 2026 statutory deadline."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Comprehensive discovery served on all defendants",
              "description": "Plaintiffs serve wide-ranging interrogatories and document requests on all represented defendants, targeting deposit handling, image publication, agency, insurance, and management agreements.",
              "subjectOf": [
                {
                  "@type": "Article",
                  "name": "Discovery Is Not a Word Game: Motion to Determine Sufficiency of Defendants’ RFA Response",
                  "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/discovery-is-not-a-word-game-motion-to-determine-sufficiency-of-defendants-rfa-response",
                  "description": "When “vague and ambiguous” becomes a strategy, Requests for Admission stop narrowing issues and start hiding them. Motion seeks court intervention after defendants deployed coordinated 'vague and ambiguous' boilerplate to avoid clean admissions."
                }
              ],
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-10-03"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "comprehensiveDiscoveryServed"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Creates formal discovery obligations that later support motions to compel, sanctions requests, and adverse inferences when defendants delay or evade substantive responses."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Meridian files crossclaims against SAC 181",
              "description": "Bolyard files Answer including crossclaims alleging SAC 181 bears 'primary fault' while Meridian liability 'only secondary or passive' (¶115, 125).",
              "sameAs": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P11A2",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-10-09"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "crossclaimsFiled"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Judicial admission of agency relationship; proves Meridian authorized to manage 'on behalf of SAC'; creates buffer protecting Meridian from direct exposure."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint",
              "description": "Plaintiffs move for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, attaching the full proposed pleading and exhibits that add Charles S. Altman individually and quantify image-publication counts.",
              "sameAs": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P5A1",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-10-24"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "motionForSecondAmendedComplaint"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Seeks to expand the case to include the property owner individually and to cement image-publication and syndication facts in the pleadings, increasing both leverage and potential recovery."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Emergency Rule 11 sanctions motion against Meridian counsel",
              "description": "Plaintiffs file an Emergency Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions challenging Meridian’s Answer as abusive and misleading, while SAC 181 files its Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint.",
              "url": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A12",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-10-29"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "emergencyRule11AndMTD"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Escalates the lawfare dimension of the case and creates an early record of alleged bad-faith litigation conduct by defense counsel, relevant to later sanctions and fee-shifting."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "SAC 181 moves for AI case-management order; plaintiffs move to compel",
              "description": "SAC 181’s counsel files a Motion for a Case Management Order Regarding the Use of AI, while plaintiffs file a Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and for Sanctions.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/defense-ai-disclosure-motion-pre-ai-case-history-disproves-competence-suspicion",
              "sameAs": [
                "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/ViewDocument?param1=dTOisgUzXXXBBBXXX0DGeRXXXBBBXXXiWhtnnwXXXGGGXXXXXXGGGXXX&param2=FiP6VqXpnDgXXXGGGXXX&param3=FiP6VqXpnDgXXXGGGXXX",
                "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A18"
              ],
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-11-10"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "aiCaseManagementAndMotionToCompel"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Highlights defense attempts to reframe the case around AI use, and plaintiffs’ counter-move to refocus on evidence production and obstruction, deepening the lawfare-exposure narrative."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "RocketsFight.org site launches",
              "description": "Plaintiffs launch the RocketsFight.org campaign website, framing the case as a housing-justice testbed and inviting public and donor engagement around systemic landlord-tenant reform.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-11-18"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "rocketsFightSiteLaunch"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Transforms the matter from a private dispute into a public-interest case and supports plaintiffs’ argument that meaningful remedies must include systemic-change leverage, not just individual compensation."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Discovery of Jonathan Altman’s ownership interest and undervaluation",
              "description": "Plaintiffs obtain Samuel H. Altman’s estate documents showing Jonathan S. Altman inheriting a share of SAC 181, LLC and valuing his father’s 33% interest at $83,000 despite public market indications of a much higher property value.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-12-01"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "jonathanAltmanOwnershipAndValuationDiscovery"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Connects a public figure associated with affordable-housing advocacy to SAC 181’s financial benefits and alleged under-oath undervaluation, strengthening veil-piercing, hypocrisy, and systemic-valuation-anomaly themes."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Jonathan S. Altman Implicating Probate valuation memorandum filed",
              "description": "Plaintiffs file a memorandum regarding probate records and SAC 181, LLC, documenting valuation discrepancies and Jonathan Altman’s public affordable-housing role.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/court-memo-details-350k-probate-valuation-gap-linked-to-affordable-housing-board-member",
              "sameAs": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A28",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-12-03"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "probateValuationMemoFiled"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Puts the court and defendants on notice of alleged systemic valuation anomalies and conflicts between Jonathan Altman’s public housing-justice posture and his financial conduct regarding SAC 181."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Jonathan S. Altman Implicating Supplemental memorandum on systemic valuation anomalies filed",
              "description": "Plaintiffs file a Supplemental Memorandum highlighting an apparent 95% devaluation of Altman family–owned Charles Realty Company, Inc. stock between 2006 and 2021 and tying it to Jonathan Altman’s role.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/the-altman-files-when-public-trust-meets-private-extraction",
              "sameAs": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A30",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-12-11"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "supplementalValuationAnomaliesMemo"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Broadens the case narrative into a systemic-valuation and potential probate-fraud issue, increasing media interest and supporting arguments for veil piercing and meaningful punitive remedies."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Motion to Determine Sufficiency of RFA answers filed",
              "description": "Plaintiffs file a Motion to Determine Sufficiency of Defendants’ answers and objections to Requests for Admission, seeking clean admit/deny responses, potential deemed admissions, and Rule 37 expense-shifting based on alleged coordinated evasive discovery conduct.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/discovery-is-not-a-word-game-motion-to-determine-sufficiency-of-defendants-rfa-response",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-12-23"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "motionDetermineSufficiencyRFA"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfCourtFiling",
                  "value": "https://rocketsfight.org/case-files/plaintiffs/2025-12-23-Plaintiffs-Motion-Sufficiency-Answers-RFAs-Deemed-Admsn-Compel-CP1005095.pdf"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Escalates the discovery-obstruction record by invoking Rule 36(a) sufficiency review and Rule 37 remedies; positions plaintiffs to obtain compelled amended admissions, deemed admissions, and sanctions/expenses based on coordinated boilerplate objections across two defense firms."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Bolyard files motion to quash",
              "description": "Resnick Louis files Motion to Quash subpoenas targeting AppFolio, ShowMojo, Matterport - 42 days before LLR deadline.",
              "subjectOf": [
                {
                  "@type": "Article",
                  "name": "When Two Firms Coordinate to Hide Evidence Before a Regulatory Deadline",
                  "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/when-two-firms-coordinate-to-hide-evidence-before-a-regulatory-deadline",
                  "description": "Comprehensive exhibits documenting coordinated obstruction timed to block evidence before February 20, 2026 LLR regulatory deadline and an explanation behind the birth of this platform for radical transparency and systemic change towards access to housing justice for the vulnerable."
                }
              ],
              "sameAs": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P11A5",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-08"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "defenseObstructionQuash1"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "First move in coordinated obstruction cluster; blocks property management software evidence material to LLR investigation."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Meridian contacts AppFolio (witness tampering)",
              "description": "AppFolio email confirms Meridian 'formal notice' instructing non-compliance with subpoena, violating SC Code 16-9-340 obstruction of law enforcement.",
              "subjectOf": [
                {
                  "@type": "Article",
                  "name": "When Two Firms Coordinate to Hide Evidence Before a Regulatory Deadline",
                  "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/when-two-firms-coordinate-to-hide-evidence-before-a-regulatory-deadline",
                  "description": "Comprehensive exhibits documenting coordinated obstruction timed to block evidence before February 20, 2026 LLR regulatory deadline and an explanation behind the birth of this platform for radical transparency and systemic change towards access to housing justice for the vulnerable."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "DigitalDocument",
                  "name": "Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motions to Quash Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Disqualify Counsel for Unconsentable Conflicts of Interest and for Sanctions",
                  "url": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A37",
                  "description": "111-page Opposition establishing three dispositive defects: (1) Mandatory disqualification of counsel Bolyard for irreconcilable conflicts representing Meridian's indemnity claim while quashing evidence needed for that claim; (2) Phelps Dunbar's waived motion filed one day past deadline; (3)Meridian's witness tampering via direct contact with AppFolio."
                }
              ],
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-09"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "witnessTampering"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Criminal witness tampering; consciousness of guilt; demonstrates Meridian affirmatively obstructed evidence from reaching LLR investigator."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfKeyEvidence",
                  "value": "AppFolio emails Jan 9 & 12, 2026 - Exhibit C1, C2"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Phelps Dunbar files motion to quash (untimely)",
              "description": "Kevin O'Brien files Motion to Quash Synovus subpoena on Day 20 (deadline Day 19), ignores mass private image syndication, retaliatory eviction, and other counts to characterizes eight-count fraud case as 'deposit dispute'.",
              "subjectOf": [
                {
                  "@type": "Article",
                  "name": "When Two Firms Coordinate to Hide Evidence Before a Regulatory Deadline",
                  "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/when-two-firms-coordinate-to-hide-evidence-before-a-regulatory-deadline",
                  "description": "Comprehensive exhibits documenting coordinated obstruction timed to block evidence before February 20, 2026 LLR regulatory deadline and an explanation behind the birth of this platform for radical transparency and systemic change towards access to housing justice for the vulnerable."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "DigitalDocument",
                  "name": "Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motions to Quash Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Disqualify Counsel for Unconsentable Conflicts of Interest and for Sanctions",
                  "url": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A37",
                  "description": "111-page Opposition establishing three dispositive defects: (1) Mandatory disqualification of counsel Bolyard for irreconcilable conflicts representing Meridian's indemnity claim while quashing evidence needed for that claim; (2) Phelps Dunbar's waived motion filed one day past deadline; (3)Meridian's witness tampering via direct contact with AppFolio."
                }
              ],
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-12"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "defenseObstructionQuash2"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Waived per Ex parte Smith (untimely); abandons SAC 181 veil-piercing defense to protect Tara license; minimizes case scope to prevent LLR investigator recognition of broader fraud."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Bolyard delays Tara deposition to Feb 24",
              "description": "Bolyard unilaterally reschedules Tara Bayles deposition from Jan to Feb 24 - four days AFTER Feb 20 LLR deadline.",
              "subjectOf": [
                {
                  "@type": "Article",
                  "name": "When Two Firms Coordinate to Hide Evidence Before a Regulatory Deadline",
                  "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/when-two-firms-coordinate-to-hide-evidence-before-a-regulatory-deadline",
                  "description": "Comprehensive exhibits documenting coordinated obstruction timed to block evidence before February 20, 2026 LLR regulatory deadline and an explanation behind the birth of this platform for radical transparency and systemic change towards access to housing justice for the vulnerable."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "DigitalDocument",
                  "name": "Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motions to Quash Subpoenas and Cross-Motion to Disqualify Counsel for Unconsentable Conflicts of Interest and for Sanctions",
                  "url": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A37",
                  "description": "111-page Opposition establishing three dispositive defects: (1) Mandatory disqualification of counsel Bolyard for irreconcilable conflicts representing Meridian's indemnity claim while quashing evidence needed for that claim; (2) Phelps Dunbar's waived motion filed one day past deadline; (3)Meridian's witness tampering via direct contact with AppFolio."
                }
              ],
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-12"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "depositionDelayObstruction"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Coordinated obstruction; prevents Tara testimony before LLR investigation concludes."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Plaintiffs Opposition to All Quash Motions Filed",
              "description": "111-page Opposition documenting coordinated obstruction pattern, witness tampering, and untimely filings.",
              "url": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A37",
              "subjectOf": [
                {
                  "@type": "Article",
                  "name": "The 42-Day Obstruction Window",
                  "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/when-two-firms-coordinate-to-hide-evidence-before-a-regulatory-deadline"
                }
              ],
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-14"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "oppositionFiled"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfCriminalReferrals",
                  "value": "Charleston County Solicitor, U.S. Attorney"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Email to IPG adjuster re: crossclaims",
              "description": "Plaintiffs notify IPG adjuster that 97 days passed since crossclaims against SAC 181 with no Answer, raising insurance bad faith issues.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-14"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "ipgBadFaithNotification"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Exposes IPG duty inversion (protecting additional insured Meridian at primary insured SAC 181 expense); triggers next-day Stipulation of Dismissal."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfKeyEvidence",
                  "value": "Jan 14, 2026 email to Gladys Lambert"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Stipulation of dismissal of crossclaims",
              "description": "Defense files Stipulation dismissing Meridian crossclaims against SAC 181 - day after IPG notification.",
              "sameAs": "[docket link]",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-15"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "crossclaimsDismissal"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Removes buffer; SAC 181 now directly exposed without Meridian 'will pay' deflection; rapid response proves coordination and consciousness of insurance conflict; BUT plaintiffs retain right to use crossclaim admissions as evidence of unified enterprise."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Subpoena to Charles Realty Company",
              "description": "Plaintiffs serve subpoena duces tecum on Charles Realty Company, Inc. targeting probate fraud, Flash Transfer, operational commingling evidence.",
              "sameAs": "[docket link]",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-16"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "subpoenaCharlesRealty"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Escalates veil-piercing discovery to Altman family enterprise level; targets $5 Flash Transfer Feb 21, 2007 and 95% CRC stock devaluation 2006-2020."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Subpoena to LLR Investigator Kasey Williams",
              "description": "Plaintiffs serve subpoena for Feb 9, 2026 deposition of LLR Investigator Kasey Williams (File 2025-566).",
              "sameAs": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=[pending]",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-16"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "subpoenaLLRInvestigator"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Locks in LLR findings 11 days before Feb 20 deadline, before defense can 'manage' outcome; creates wedge forcing Tara to choose: protect Altmans or save license; includes 'two-way information exchange' allowing investigator to question plaintiff about evidence."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "LLR investigator deposition (scheduled)",
              "description": "Scheduled deposition of Investigator Kasey Williams at LLR Columbia office; factual testimony only (no legal conclusions or prosecutorial recommendations).",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-02-09"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "llrInvestigatorDeposition"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Critical inflection point - locks in regulatory findings before defense can intervene; creates public record of investigation evidence; determines Tara license threat level; if LLR moves to quash, shows potential for regulator obstruction as well."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDepositionScope",
                  "value": "Complaint volume/patterns against Tara/Meridian; SAC 181 OP account review; documents collected; timeline; whether violations appear isolated or systemic"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "LLR investigation deadline (150 days)",
              "description": "150-day statutory deadline for LLR investigation conclusion (150 days from Sept 23, 2025 complaint).",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-02-20"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "llrDeadline"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "All defense obstruction tactics (Jan 8-12 quash motions, witness tampering, deposition delays) timed to prevent evidence from reaching investigator before this date."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Altman's Furniture Company founded (historical milestone)",
              "description": "Israel Altman founds Altman's Furniture Company, establishing a long-running family business known for the principle 'Do Right by People'.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "1928-01-01"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "businessFoundation"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Provides long-arc family legacy context referenced in later narrative about public trust and private conduct."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Charles Realty Company, Inc. founded",
              "description": "Israel Altman founds Charles Realty Company, Inc., beginning systematic real-estate operations.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "1939-01-01"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "corporateFoundation"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Establishes a long-lived corporate vehicle relevant to later valuation and ownership questions."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "181 Gordon Street constructed and titled to Edith T. Altman",
              "description": "181 Gordon Street is constructed circa 1940 and title is transferred from Charles Realty Company, Inc. to Edith T. Altman.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "1940-01-01"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "propertyConstruction"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfProperty",
                  "value": "181 Gordon Street, Charleston, SC 29403"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Anchors the chain-of-title story used in later pleadings and public narrative."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "1950 Census documents Altman residence at 181 Gordon",
              "description": "1950 U.S. Census documents Israel and Edith Altman living at 181 Gordon Street with family, reflecting multi-decade family residence.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "1950-01-01"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "genealogicalRecord"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfSource",
                  "value": "U.S. Census Bureau, 1950 Census"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Public-record corroboration of long-term family ties to the property."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Israel Altman consolidates control of Charles Realty (estimated 1970s)",
              "description": "Israel Altman consolidates control of Charles Realty Company, Inc. and related family entities by buying out brothers' interests (estimated timeframe).",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "1970-01-01"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "corporateRestructure"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfProvenanceNote",
                  "value": "Estimated date; details to be confirmed in discovery"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Provides historical context for consolidated family control of key entities."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Probate valuation memorandum filed",
              "description": "Plaintiffs file a memorandum raising probate valuation concerns relating to SAC 181, LLC and alleging conflict-of-interest optics with a public affordable-housing role.",
              "url": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A28",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-12-03"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "probateValuationChallenge"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Expands the narrative and discovery focus to probate valuation documents and potential conflicts."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Supplemental probate memorandum filed",
              "description": "Plaintiffs file a supplemental memorandum alleging a broader pattern of valuation anomalies across Altman-related probate records and entities.",
              "url": "https://docviewer.charlestoncounty.gov/PublicIndex/Index?viewertype=cms&ctagency=10002&casenumber=2025CP1005095&docseq=P1A30",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2025-12-11"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "supplementalProbateMemo"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Supports veil-piercing/enterprise-scope theories and justifies expanded discovery into entity structures and valuation practices."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Defense silence extends to 30 days",
              "description": "After the early-December activity, defense counsel provide no substantive response for roughly 30 days, aside from an email about resending a missing attachment.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDateRange",
                  "value": "2025-12-01/2025-12-31"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "defenseSilence"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Supports a protracted-discovery posture and continued third-party subpoena work."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Resnick Louis Motion to Quash Filed",
              "description": "Alicia N. Bolyard of Resnick Louis, P.C. files Motion to Quash third-party subpoenas to AppFolio, ShowMojo, and Matterport seeking property management records and image publication logs. Motion characterizes eight-count fraud case as 'deposit dispute' and claims subpoenas are 'irrelevant fishing expedition.' Filed 43 days before LLR Investigation File 2025-566 deadline (Feb 20, 2026).",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-08"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "motionToQuash"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Part of coordinated obstruction pattern timed to LLR Feb 20 deadline; fourth instance of 'deposit dispute' minimization across defense filings."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfActors",
                  "value": "Alicia N. Bolyard (Resnick Louis, P.C.)"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDaysBeforeLLRDeadline",
                  "value": "43"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Meridian Witness Tampering - AppFolio Contact",
              "description": "Meridian Residential Group, LLC directly contacts third-party subpoena recipient AppFolio, Inc., instructing them to refuse compliance with court-ordered subpoena. AppFolio paralegal emails Plaintiffs: 'We have received notice from our customer [Meridian] that they intend to object to this subpoena...we will not be providing any responsive documents.' Contact occurred one day after Resnick Louis filed Motion to Quash, suggesting coordination. Violates SC Code §16-9-340 (obstruction of law enforcement/investigation) and 18 USC §1512 (witness tampering).",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-09"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "witnessTampering"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Criminal violation of SC Code §16-9-340 and 18 USC §1512(b)(3); demonstrates consciousness of guilt and coordinated obstruction pattern."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfCriminalStatute",
                  "value": "SC Code §16-9-340 - Obstruction of law enforcement; 18 USC §1512(b)(3) - Witness tampering"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEvidenceSource",
                  "value": "AppFolio emails dated 1/9/26 and 1/12/26 confirming Meridian contact"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Phelps Dunbar Untimely Motion to Quash Synovus Bank Subpoena",
              "description": "Kevin M. O'Brien and Justine M. Tate of Phelps Dunbar LLP file Motion to Quash subpoena to Synovus Bank seeking records of 'SAC 181 OP' operating account from which security deposit refund checks were issued. Motion filed on Day 20, one day after SCRCP 45(d)(2)(B) deadline (14 days + 5 days for service = 19 days maximum). Under Ex parte Smith, 407 S.C. 422 (2014), untimely objections are waived. Motion seeks to block evidence that would HELP SAC 181's veil-piercing defense (proving corporate separation from Meridian), suggesting Phelps Dunbar serves insurer/co-defendant interests over client SAC 181.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-12"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "untimelyMotion"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Waived as untimely per Ex parte Smith; demonstrates captured counsel serving IPG/Tara interests over SAC 181; blocks evidence favorable to client's veil-piercing defense."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfActors",
                  "value": "Kevin M. O'Brien, Justine M. Tate (Phelps Dunbar LLP)"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfFiledDay",
                  "value": "Day 20 (deadline was Day 19 per SCRCP 45(d)(2)(B))"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Stephanie Phillips  Deposition Unilaterally Rescheduled Past LLR Deadline",
              "description": "Resnick Louis counsel Alicia Bolyard unilaterally reschedules Stephanie Phillips' deposition from January 20, 2026 to February 24, 2026—four days AFTER the SC Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation (LLR) Investigation File 2025-566 statutory deadline of February 20, 2026. Rescheduling prevents sworn testimony regarding PMIC trust account violations from reaching investigator before deadline. No good cause shown; appears coordinated with witness tampering and quash motions to obstruct regulatory investigation.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-12"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "depositionObstruction"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Part of 42-day coordinated obstruction window (Jan 8 - Feb 20) to prevent evidence from reaching LLR Investigation File 2025-566 before deadline."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfOriginalDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-20"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfRescheduledDate",
                  "value": "2026-02-24"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDaysAfterLLRDeadline",
                  "value": "4"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Plaintiffs Opposition to All Quash Motions Filed",
              "description": "Plaintiffs file comprehensive 111-page Opposition to all three defense Motions to Quash (Resnick Louis, Phelps Dunbar), documenting coordinated obstruction pattern, witness tampering, untimely filings, and consciousness of guilt. Opposition includes new evidence developed since discovery: (1) Trust account violation—'SAC 181 OP' account configuration violates SC Code §40-57-136(A)(1); (2) Witness tampering timeline showing Meridian-AppFolio contact one day after Bolyard motion; (3) Untimely filing analysis under Ex parte Smith; (4) Captured counsel theory showing Phelps Dunbar blocking evidence favorable to SAC 181. Requests criminal referrals to Charleston County Solicitor and U.S. Attorney for witness tampering violations.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-14"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "oppositionFiled"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Comprehensive documentation of conspiracy, obstruction, and criminal violations; establishes consciousness of guilt; supports all civil claims and requests criminal referrals."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfPageCount",
                  "value": "111 pages"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfCriminalReferrals",
                  "value": "Charleston County Solicitor, U.S. Attorney (witness tampering, obstruction)"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "LLR Coordination Email from Alternate Address",
              "description": "After three email delivery failures since October 2025 (complaints@llr.sc.gov bounced 10/16, 10/18, 1/16), Plaintiffs send comprehensive coordination email to LLR investigators from alternate address rocketsfight@gmail.com. Email confirms Feb 9, 2026 deposition of Investigator Kasey Williams at 1:30 PM at LLR Columbia office, ensuring evidence delivery 11 days before Feb 20 statutory deadline. Provides new evidence developed since October: (1) Trust account violation—'SAC 181 OP' account configuration violates SC Code §40-57-136(A)(1); (2) Coordinated obstruction—quash motions (1/8, 1/12), witness tampering (1/9 Meridian-AppFolio contact), deposition delay to 2/24 (past LLR deadline); (3) 111-page Opposition documenting conspiracy. Requests confirmation by Friday 2 PM. Attaches complete evidence package.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-22T20:24:00"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "regulatoryCoordination"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Ensures LLR investigation proceeds despite defense obstruction; Feb 9 deposition delivers evidence 11 days before deadline; alternate email resolves delivery issues."
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfAlternateEmail",
                  "value": "rocketsfight@gmail.com (after three failures from chris@thaut.io)"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDepositionDate",
                  "value": "2026-02-09T13:30:00"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDaysBeforeLLRDeadline",
                  "value": "11 days before Feb 20, 2026 LLR deadline"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEvidenceIncluded",
                  "value": "Trust account violations, coordinated obstruction timeline, witness tampering, 111-page Opposition, fake postmark"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Third-party subpoena response deadline",
              "description": "Deadline for responses to third-party subpoenas seeking independent records relevant to image syndication, account handling, and mailing metadata.",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-01-23"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "thirdPartySubpoena"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfSubpoenaTargets",
                  "value": [
                    "ShowMojo, Inc.",
                    "AppFolio, Inc.",
                    "Matterport, Inc.",
                    "Synovus Bank"
                  ]
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfStrategicSignificance",
                  "value": "Independent third-party documents can corroborate or contradict contested narratives and shape deposition strategy."
                }
              ]
            },
                            {
                "@type": "StructuredValue",
                "name": "Law Firm Partnership Invitation Launch",
                "description": "Public launch of '<a href=\"https://rocketsfight.org/to-the-firm-that-sees\">To the Firm That Sees the System</a>' page, inviting values-aligned litigation partners to join the case. The page outlines the systemic strategy and pre-built evidence architecture.",
                "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/to-the-firm-that-sees",
                "additionalProperty": [
                  {
                    "@type": "PropertyValue",
                    "name": "rfDate",
                    "value": "2026-02-14"
                  },
                  {
                    "@type": "PropertyValue",
                    "name": "rfEventType",
                    "value": "partnershipInvitation"
                  },
                  {
                    "@type": "PropertyValue",
                    "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                    "value": "Signals escalation readiness to defense; adds a balancing loops to the damaging justice = harm escalating reinforcing loop documented on the <a href=\"https://rocketsfight.org/open-letter-altmans\">Open Letter to the Altmans</a>, demonstrating they can't end the case by ending a person, though they got close by triggering a <a href=\"https://rocketsfight.org/the-case/the-health-crisis-filings-tenant-harm-weaponized-through-defense-gaslighting\">nervous breakdown</a>."
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "@type": "StructuredValue",
                "name": "Countdown to Housing Justice Audit Launch",
                "description": "Initiation of the 72-hour <a href=\"https://rocketsfight.org/countdown\">countdown</a> to the release of the Housing Justice Audit and Jonathan Altman's decision window. Narrative focus shifts to the 'MVM Method' system study findings.",
                "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/countdown",
                "subjectOf": {
                    "@type": "EventSeries",
                    "@id": "https://rocketsfight.org/schema/countdown-week.json",
                    "name": "Full Countdown Narrative & Event Series",
                    "description": "The complete, structured 4-day narrative arc of the Housing Justice Audit release and decision window."
                  },
                "additionalProperty": [
                  {
                    "@type": "PropertyValue",
                    "name": "rfDate",
                    "value": "2026-02-17T12:00:00"
                  },
                  {
                    "@type": "PropertyValue",
                    "name": "rfEventType",
                    "value": "countdownLaunch"
                  },
                  {
                    "@type": "PropertyValue",
                    "name": "rfNarrativeFunction",
                    "value": "The Call to Adventure: establishing the ticking clock and the dual-deadline convergence (LLR & Altman decision)."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Housing Justice Audit Report Preliminary Draft Release",
              "description": "Public release of the Preliminary Draft of the 'Housing Justice Audit of the Charleston, SC Housing Justice System' report, documenting system failures from the perspective of the Most Vulnerable Member (MVM). This version is watermarked  'Draft' and includes a final section with 'A' and 'B' versions with Jonathan S. Altman will choose between within 72 hours as McNeil is requesting he delivery the report to the Homeownership Initiative Committee he sits on, with his endorsement and accompanying commitment to change his operating model in his family's Real Estate business. This choice of 'A' completes the last section with Jonathan as an example of leadership in making the change. Jonathan will be encouraged and allowed to add his own words to the ending as well. No endorsement or no response at all still count as the 'B' choice, which ends with the Altmans as an example of what happens in the new world of hyper-transparent ownership to tenant harm visibility and amplification.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/countdown",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-02-17T12:00:00"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "reportRelease"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfMethodology",
                  "value": "MVM Method (inspired by Vanguard Method & Jeff Gray)"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Formal documentation of systemic findings; serves as a public record of the 'status swap' reveal."
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "@type": "StructuredValue",
              "name": "Housing Justice Audit Report Release",
              "description": "Public release of the 'Housing Justice Audit of the Charleston, SC Housing Justice System' report, documenting system failures from the perspective of the Most Vulnerable Member (MVM), now incorporating the full text with either Jonathan S. Altman as champion or the Altman family as an example of what happens when the 'Passive Investing' brittle and mechanical mental model of rental housing is held onto.",
              "url": "https://rocketsfight.org/countdown",
              "additionalProperty": [
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfDate",
                  "value": "2026-02-17T12:00:00"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfEventType",
                  "value": "reportRelease"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfMethodology",
                  "value": "MVM Method (inspired by Vanguard Method & Jeff Gray)"
                },
                {
                  "@type": "PropertyValue",
                  "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
                  "value": "Formal documentation of systemic findings; serves as a public record of the 'status swap' reveal."
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "@type": "MediaObject",
      "@id": "https://rocketsfight.org/schema/image-track-roadstead-stills",
      "name": "Track 1 – Roadstead Still Images",
      "description": "15–16 still images obtained by Roadstead Management during a purported inspection, later used in Meridian marketing, including images of Meaghan and intimate interior spaces.",
      "creator": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Roadstead Management"
      },
      "publisher": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Meridian Residential Group, LLC"
      },
      "contentUrl": "https://rocketsfight.org/case-documents/pdf/explainer-and-timeline",
      "contentLocation": {
        "@type": "Place",
        "name": "181 Gordon Street, Charleston, SC 29403"
      },
      "temporalCoverage": "2025-06-29/2025-09-23",
      "alternateName": "Roadstead stills used in Meridian marketing",
      "keywords": [
        "unauthorized photos",
        "tenant images",
        "Roadstead",
        "Meridian",
        "AppFolio",
        "ShowMojo"
      ],
      "additionalProperty": [
        {
          "@type": "PropertyValue",
          "name": "rfAcquisitionMethod",
          "value": "Alleged inspection; images later repurposed for marketing without informed tenant consent."
        },
        {
          "@type": "PropertyValue",
          "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
          "value": "First online publication of tenant images without informed consent; contradicts renovation pretext and supports privacy invasion and retaliation claims."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "@type": "MediaObject",
      "@id": "https://rocketsfight.org/schema/image-track-matterport-tour",
      "name": "Track 2 – Meridian Matterport Virtual Tour",
      "description": "Matterport 3D tour of the occupied home capturing Chris on the couch, Rocket in medical diapers, and Thaut Strategic Leadership branding, branded as presented by Meridian.",
      "creator": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Meridian Residential Group, LLC"
      },
      "publisher": {
        "@type": "Organization",
        "name": "Meridian Residential Group, LLC"
      },
      "contentUrl": "https://rocketsfight.org/case-documents/pdf/explainer-and-timeline",
      "encodingFormat": "model/x.matterport",
      "contentLocation": {
        "@type": "Place",
        "name": "181 Gordon Street, Charleston, SC 29403"
      },
      "temporalCoverage": "2025-07-16/2025-09-23",
      "alternateName": "Meridian Matterport tour of occupied home",
      "keywords": [
        "Matterport",
        "virtual tour",
        "tenant images",
        "false endorsement",
        "privacy violation"
      ],
      "additionalProperty": [
        {
          "@type": "PropertyValue",
          "name": "rfAcquisitionMethod",
          "value": "Fraudulent misrepresentation via AI-removal promise by leasing agent inducing consent to interior imaging."
        },
        {
          "@type": "PropertyValue",
          "name": "rfLegalSignificance",
          "value": "Creates a virtual tour later published and used in marketing, supporting claims of fraudulent inducement, privacy invasion, and false endorsement."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}